Skip to main content

[C++] Object slicing

Object slicing refers to the loss of information from a derived class instance when it is copied to a parent class instance, due to the nature of value types that assign values to the stack instead of the heap. This is a bug that occurs in languages like Java, which only have reference types that allocate values to the heap.

Upcasting should not be used for value types due to the issue of object slicing. In most cases where upcasting is needed, there is already an issue with the code that needs to be fixed. If upcasting must be used under certain circumstances, values must be assigned to the heap.

This article is a translation of a Korean post written in 2015. If you would like to view the original, please refer to this link.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Aspect-Oriented Programming with Python Examples

Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) manages code by grouping it into independent modules known as objects, emphasizing the crucial principle of Separation of Concerns. This means each object should focus on its specific responsibilities. However, real-world applications often feature functionalities that are common across multiple objects or modules, such as logging, security, transaction management, and performance monitoring. These functionalities are called Cross-cutting Concerns. Challenge of Cross-Cutting Concerns Scattering These cross-cutting concerns, when handled solely with OOP, create two major problems. The first problem is Scattering , which is when code for a specific functionality is spread across multiple places through copying and pasting. For instance, imagine adding user permission checks and logging code to every function. The same logging and permission checking code would repeatedly appear within each method. Tangling The other issue is Tangling . This refe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Iterator Adapters in Rust

An Iterator that takes another iterator and returns a new one is called an iterator adapter . The name "adapter" comes from one of the GoF's design patterns, the adapter pattern . However, in reality, it corresponds more to the decorator pattern , so if you pay too much attention to the name, you might get confused about its purpose. So it's better not to worry too much about the name. Enough complaining about the name, what does an iterator adapter do? An iterator adapter adds a task to be performed when the iterator iterates. This will be easier to understand when you see an example. The map function is one of the famous adapters. The iterator returned by the map function for those who have used functional languages iterates over new values transformed from the original values. Besides, various adapters are already implemented in the standard library. Among them, the most frequently used are those that are convenient to use with loops. Examples include the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Difference Between the clear Command in Linux and Mac

I've been writing a series of posts about CSI Sequences, but we rarely use CSI Sequences directly. However, there is a CSI Sequence that we use unknowingly. It's the clear command that clears the screen. The clear command basically uses two types of CSI sequences. One is CSI H ( Cu rsor P osition, a.k.a CUP); it moves the cursor to the beginning of the screen. The cursor is at the top-left corner after the command ends, thanks to CUP. The second CSI Sequence is CSI 2 J ( E rase in D isplay, a.k.a. ED), which is used to clear the entire screen. Linux and Mac use these two sequences; they behave the same way up to this point. However, Linux's clear and Mac's differ in their subsequent actions. In a nutshell, Linux's clear clears the scrollback buffer, while Mac's does not. Linux's one prints CSI 3 J after the two sequences. CSI 3 J is an extension of the Escape Sequence introduced by xterm that removes lines stored in the scrollback buffer. Since be...
Post a Comment
Read more